The Old Man and the Sea

Today’s blog post contains one of my unique book reviews. In this case, the book in question is The Old Man and the Sea by Ernest Hemingway (1952). It is a short book, at 108 pages, so more a novella than a book. It is strange in the sense that it does not have chapters, but rather one continuous read with only paragraph breaks.

Spoiler Alert – Note that I am going to talk fully about the book, so give this review a miss if you are worried about spoilers.

The book is about an old man named Santiago who lives in a simple shack and fishes off the coast of Havana, Cuba. The story is told in 3^rd person and begins with a discussion and dialog between the old man and a boy named Manolin he has befriended. The boy looks after Santiago because he’s old and he likes to fish with him occasionally to keep him company, and, I think, to learn from him – like an apprentice. The story moves forward, and Manolin is told by his parents that he must fish with someone else, since the old man has not caught anything in 86 days, or something like that. They call the old man unlucky because of this.

One day, Santiago heads out as usual, only this time on his own, and the main saga of the story begins. Santiago uses a small skiff that entails rowing and sailing when winds allow. It is a small boat with a single sail that he can manage on his own. While heading out he is determined to find a large fish – a tuna, or a marlin, or even a dolphin or shark as a last resort.

Santiago heads further and further from the coast and after a long while he hooks something and can’t determine what it is for the longest time. The struggle to land the fish is epic and the struggles go on for about three days. His struggles, and his pains – his hopes and fears – are revealed through the story as the narrator describes it and as Santiago, himself, speaks aloud to himself. During the journey, Santiago catches other fish with a separate line and eats their raw flesh to keep his strength. About a day after the large fish is hooked and Santiago has let it run many times to wear the fish down it leaps from the sea and reveals itself to be a huge marlin, likely bigger than anything he has ever caught. He is determined to bring the fish in and often wishes the boy was there to help. Santiago suffers great pain in his back and hands as he struggles to “tame” the beast and hopefully get it latched to his boat for the journey home where he should fetch a good price for such a large fish. It is his livelihood after all.

All through the journey, Santiago speaks of many things about luck, about the bond between the fish and the fisherman, and of course, the sanctity of life and the taking of it. Is it a sin he asks, is it the circle of life – all though he doesn’t use those specific words. In so many ways, it is a simple read, but it has deep implication regarding the nature of life or of living – of its challenges. It speaks of aging and dignity, and so much more.

As I read, I also thought about how Hemingway understood the process of fishing and how wonderfully he wound that into the book – showing the gift that Santiago had as a fisherman. I found myself intrigued by the idea of catching a large fish with a smaller-test line – and why the fisherman would allow the fish to run, so as not to snap the line by simply tying it off on the boat. I have done some fishing in my life but didn’t realize these important facts until I was reading this book. And, of course, this too is analogous to living life. Think about that – catching a 1500-pound fish with a line rated for 500, or even 1000 pounds. Tie it off and the fish can snap it. Wear the fish down by letting it run on and off, and it tires and loses its will. Or it can’t eat because it is hooked by its mouth. All very cruel in some ways, but natural for the life of the fisherman.

After about two and a half days, and the big fish having dragged the boat miles further out to sea, Santiago gets the big fish “landed” and tied to the side of the skiff. It is obviously too large to bring into the boat and Santiago knows that the journey back will bring a whole host of other problems – mainly sharks that will follow the blood scent and will attack without fear. He knows that he is a long way from home and the shark encounters will be plenty. Being familiar with the sea and the stars, Santiago raises his sail and begins the journey home.

The first shark encounter numbers two, and both take huge chunks out of this fish. Meanwhile, Santiago struggles to ward them off and eventually kills them with the harpoon he had brought along and used to land the big fish earlier. Sadly, the harpoon is lost during that first attack, and that adds to the worries to come. Knowing that more trouble lies ahead, Santiago straps his only knife to one of the oars. Sanitiago’s dwindling resources are cause for worry as he is still far out and other sharks will follow suit. As Santiago continues, he reviews his history, and his dreams, which occasionally include lions. For sustenance, he eats some of the raw flesh of the marlin, easily ripped from the area of the shark attacks.

Two more shark attacks occur before Santiago gets home. In the second attack, although he kills them, they have managed to eat large chunks of the big fish and he loses his knife in the process. In the final shark attack, Santiago uses his tiller to beat the sharks to death and it is broken in the battle. Although it is broken, he can still reattach it and use it to steer home.

By the time Santiago gets back to his home beach it is still dark and no one else is in sight. He is sure that the big fish is a total loss due to the sharks and their feeding, some of which happened from underneath the boat and could not be stopped. For me, as the reader, I am feeling his pain at all the wasted effort, so reminiscent of how life can be at times.

Santiago makes his way to his hut and he sleeps. Manolin finds him in the morning, sees that he’s mostly okay, and then fetches him coffee and some breakfast. Meanwhile, some of the other fishermen are out at the beach measuring the remains of the huge marlin. There’s not really anything salvageable because it’s been mostly eaten by the sharks, but the skeletal remains and the big head with its bill, or rostrum, is still there as is the tail and the mess in between. It measures 18 feet long. Santiago tells Manolin to offer the head to a fellow fisherman so the other fellow can cut it up and use it for bait, so that something can come from the ordeal.

And just like that, the story abruptly ends there. I wished there had been more, a bit of an epilog, but I guess it had said all that Hemingway, and Santiago, had intended.

I’d say the book can be read just as a simple story – a look at a fisherman in Havana and what that might be like. Perhaps Hemingway saw something interesting in those men like Santiago and wrote about it as an artist might. I felt like Hemingway seemed to know and understand his subject.

As a “classic” we assume that there is more to the piece, more than just word on paper, and I felt that very much.

As a work of art, readers will see in it what they will and take away, hopefully, some nuggets of wisdom, as I did.

---

I did have a conversation with CoPilot after I had read the book and made most of my notes for this blog post. I want to share a few things that it mentioned and that I too noted as I read the book and pondered about it later.

Me:
I just finished reading Earnest Hemingway’s The Old Man and the Sea. I am curious to hear your interpretations of the book.

CoPilot:
That’s a beautiful choice, Don — Hemingway’s “The Old Man and the Sea” is deceptively simple, yet it ripples with depth. Here are a few layered interpretations that might resonate with your philosophical and emotionally reflective lens:

🐟 The Struggle as a Metaphor for Art and Meaning
Santiago’s epic battle with the marlin can be seen as a metaphor for the creative process itself — the solitary, often painful pursuit of something transcendent. Like an artist chasing a vision, he endures physical and emotional hardship, knowing that the final product may be diminished or misunderstood (the sharks devouring the marlin echo this). Yet, the act of striving imbues the journey with meaning. Hemingway once said, “Man is not made for defeat,” and Santiago embodies that ethos — not through triumph, but through endurance.

🌊 Nature as Mirror and Adversary
The sea is both Santiago’s companion and his challenger. It reflects the duality of nature — nurturing and indifferent, beautiful and brutal. Santiago refers to the sea as “la mar,” in the feminine, suggesting intimacy and reverence. But the sea also tests him, reminding us that harmony with nature requires humility and resilience. For someone attuned to cycles and symbolism, this tension might echo the rhythms of memory and trauma — how beauty and pain often coexist.

🧓 Aging, Dignity, and the Quiet Heroism of Obscurity
Santiago is old, poor, and largely forgotten. Yet his dignity lies in how he carries himself — with grace, skill, and quiet pride. His story challenges modern notions of success. He doesn’t win in the conventional sense, but he achieves a kind of spiritual victory. This resonates with Hemingway’s idea of “grace under pressure,” and perhaps with your own interest in elevating the broken and mysterious. Santiago’s solitude isn’t tragic — it’s sacred.

🧠 Memory, Myth, and the Echo of Dreams
The boy, the lions on the beach, the marlin — these are dreamlike motifs that recur like fragments of memory. Santiago’s dreams of lions from his youth suggest a longing for vitality, but also a mythic continuity. The novella feels like a parable, a whispered legend passed down through time. It invites reflection on how we mythologize our own lives — how memory distorts, elevates, and preserves.

Me:
I picked up on much of what you said as I read the book. As I read, I also thought about how the writer understood the process of fishing. I also found myself intrigued by the idea of catching a large fish with a smaller-test line – and why the fisherman would allow the fish to run, so as not to snap the line by simply tying it off on the boat. I have done some fishing in my life but didn’t realize these important facts until I was reading the book. And, of course, this too is analogous to living life.

CoPilot:
That’s such a rich observation, Don — and it speaks beautifully to how Hemingway’s technical precision becomes a vessel for metaphor. His understanding of fishing isn’t just accurate; it’s reverent. He writes with the quiet authority of someone who’s lived the rhythm of the line, the patience of the wait, the respect for the fish.

The idea of letting the fish run — of not overpowering it, but instead yielding, listening, adjusting — feels like a profound metaphor for how we navigate life, relationships, even creativity. If we tie off too tightly, we risk snapping the line. But if we allow space, tension, and movement, we stay connected. Santiago’s line is taut with trust, not control.

There’s something deeply philosophical in that: Yielding as strength — not weakness. Endurance as grace — not stubbornness. Respecting the struggle — not rushing the outcome.

It reminds me of your own approach to art and memory — how you allow unsettling themes to breathe, how you don’t force resolution but invite reflection. Santiago’s battle with the marlin is a kind of dance, a dialogue. And in that, it mirrors the way you riff with your materials, letting intuition guide the tension between light and dark, clarity and mystery.

Would you say this idea — of letting the line run — echoes in your own creative process? Or perhaps in how you engage with memory and transformation? I’d love to explore that thread with you.

Side note: This next part shifted a bit because the eating of the fish and the taking of life resonated with me.

Me:
I have not thought of my art process in that specific way, but yes, it could be stated as such – especially the not forcing it one way or the other. I was telling my wife about the book this morning and I reminded her of how, when we eat a chicken for supper, I often give thanks to the chicken for giving its life for our sustenance, much like Santiago mentioned in the book about the fish. Although I don’t make a big religious deal of the thank you, I do feel the bond, based on survival and sustenance, on give and take. Modern folk might think this crazy, and I know chickens don’t have the same capacity as humans, but they are living things, that do die for us.

CoPilot:
That’s a deeply grounded and poetic way of seeing the world, Don — not crazy at all, but rather a gesture of reverence that feels increasingly rare. Your quiet acknowledgment of the chicken’s life echoes Santiago’s own ritual of respect for the marlin: “I am sorry that I killed the fish,” he says, “though it meant eating him.” It’s not sentimentalism — it’s a recognition of the sacred exchange at the heart of sustenance.

This kind of gratitude — not performative, not religious in the institutional sense, but intimate and elemental — feels like a thread that runs through your creative practice too. You honor what’s broken, what’s mysterious, what’s been sacrificed. Whether it’s a chicken, a memory, or a fragment of light in a photograph, you seem to approach each with a kind of ethical imagination: What did this cost? What does it mean to receive it?

And in that, you’re resisting the modern impulse to consume without reflection. You’re restoring a sense of relationship — between eater and eaten, artist and material, human and nature. It’s the same ethos that Santiago embodies — he doesn’t dominate the sea; he enters into dialogue with it.

---

I created the feature image after I had read the book and written this blog post. It was my hope that something would reveal itself as worthy as The Old Man and the Sea.

The Old Man and the Sea – Art & Photography by Don Cheke

For this piece, I created an abstract watercolor of the sea in my digital painting program. I gave much thought to what I would add to help make the piece project the feel of the book. I thought about adding one of my boat drawings from the past, but none of them had the feel of the small skiff that Santiago used. I then pondered adding a drawing of one of the old men I had drawn in previous years. Again, they didn’t suit what I was feeling. I then recalled a picture that I took many years ago of my Uncle Walter, my mom’s middle brother. Walter was my godfather, which was a bit of a bond for us, if only in the abstract. At any rate, I laid the image of Walter over the painted background and thought that it worked quite well. Walter led a life of poverty and died an unrecovered alcoholic on June 1st, 2014. Walter embodied the struggles that life offers, but sadly he did not have or show the wisdom that Santiago did within the book, at least not that I saw. I always had mixed feelings about Walter, loving him because of his place in our family, and hating him for not finding recovery and leaning heavy on my mom for the last years of his life. I was glad when he died, for my mom’s sake, but I do think of him now and again with a quiet reverence for the suffering he endured. Rest in peace old man.

Although this blog posts ends on a sad note, I hope that you found the book review to your liking. Maybe give the book a read and let me know how you felt about it – what memories it stirred for you.

Donald B. Cheke – Saskatoon, SK